CRM & SHEETS

One source of truth, synced everywhere, automatically

Nobody sets out to run their business on four disagreeing spreadsheets. It happens one export at a time, and by the time you notice, nobody trusts the numbers.

SEE HOW IT WORKS
Real-time
Not nightly batch
Deduped
On more than email
Audited
Every field change
THE HONEST VERSION

What data drift actually costs

  • Two people call the same lead because the CRM and the sheet disagree about who owns it.
  • Monthly reporting takes a day and a half because the numbers have to be reconciled before they can be read.
  • A record updated in one system silently overwrites a newer change in another.
  • Nobody can say when a field changed or who changed it, so a disputed number cannot be settled.
HOW IT WORKS

A real one, building itself.

Not a diagram of an idea. This is the shape of a system we have actually shipped for this service, assembling and then running a job.

TRIGGER
CRM change
TRIGGER
Sheet edit
LOGIC
Match + dedupe
LOGIC
Conflict rules
ACTION
Fan-out + audit
WHAT YOU ACTUALLY GET

Six things, all of them yours.

Source-of-truth map

Field by field, which system owns which value. Most sync problems are really unmade decisions.

Fuzzy matching

Records matched on name, phone, domain and email together, with a review queue for near-matches.

Conflict resolution

Explicit rules for simultaneous edits, rather than last-write-wins quietly destroying data.

Historical cleanup

The existing duplicates get merged as part of the build. Syncing a messy dataset just spreads the mess.

Field-level audit

Who changed what, when, and which system it came from. Retained and queryable.

Backfill + replay

When something does go wrong, we can replay from the log rather than reconstructing by hand.

THE STACK

What we build this on.

Chosen per project, not per habit. If your team already runs something that works, we build on that instead.

HubSpotSalesforcePipedriveBitrix24ZohoAirtable
Google SheetsPostgreSQLSupabaseStripeXeron8n
THE PROCESS

Four steps, no surprises.

Step 1
Decide
We agree the source of truth per field. This is a business decision, and it is the whole job.
Step 2
Clean
Existing duplicates merged and normalised before any sync is switched on.
Step 3
Sync
Real-time where the API allows, scheduled where it does not, with the difference documented.
Step 4
Verify
A reconciliation job that checks the systems still agree and alerts when they drift.
WHAT IT'S WORTH

Numbers we actually see.

0manual
exports in the monthly reporting cycle
98%
duplicate reduction on a typical first clean
1source
of truth per field, decided and documented

Typical ranges from our own builds, not industry averages. Yours will depend on your process.

QUESTIONS WE GET

Data Syncs, answered.

Real-time sync or scheduled batch?

Real-time wherever the source system offers webhooks, which most modern CRMs do. Where a tool only supports polling, we schedule as tightly as its rate limits allow and are explicit about the lag. Claiming real-time on a five-minute poll is how people end up surprised.

What happens if two systems change the same record at once?

A rule you agreed up front decides, usually by designating one system the owner of that field. Where genuinely ambiguous, the change goes to a review queue rather than one silently overwriting the other.

Will you clean up our existing duplicates?

Yes, and it is part of the build rather than an add-on. Turning on sync across a duplicated dataset propagates the problem into every connected system, so cleanup comes first.

Can this work with a CRM you have not used before?

If it has an API, yes. We have built against the mainstream ones repeatedly and against plenty of niche and regional systems. The integration pattern is the same, and the unfamiliar part is usually a day of reading their docs.

NEXT STEP

Find out what this is worth to you.

A 20-minute call where we map your process and tell you honestly what is worth automating first, and what is not worth touching.